<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title><![CDATA[The PE time investment — honest calculation of hours vs results]]></title><description><![CDATA[<p dir="auto">I want to do the math that PE forums never present because the numbers are sobering:</p>
<p dir="auto">MODERATE ROUTINE:</p>
<p dir="auto">30 minutes per session x 5 days per week = 2.5 hours/week</p>
<p dir="auto">Over 2 years = approximately 260 hours</p>
<p dir="auto">TYPICAL RESULT from 2 years of consistent PE:</p>
<p dir="auto">Based on community reports and PEVeteran_Bill's honest account — perhaps 0.3-0.5 inches length, modest uncertain girth improvement</p>
<p dir="auto">THE COMPARISON:</p>
<p dir="auto">Physician-administered girth filler: 1-2 hours total (consultation + procedure + recovery). Result: measurable, consistent girth increase, immediate, lasts years.</p>
<p dir="auto">I'm not saying PE isn't worth it — for some men the journey and the natural approach matter. But the time math should be an informed choice, not a default because you didn't know clinical options existed.</p>
<p dir="auto">— TimeIsGains_Ken</p>
]]></description><link>http://localhost:4568/topic/257/the-pe-time-investment-honest-calculation-of-hours-vs-results</link><generator>RSS for Node</generator><lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2026 05:59:57 GMT</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="http://localhost:4568/topic/257.rss" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><pubDate>Mon, 18 May 2026 03:09:31 GMT</pubDate><ttl>60</ttl></channel></rss>